mobilmeny
Home > Global Inequality and Global Poverty since the Cold War: How robust is the optimistic narrative?

Global Inequality and Global Poverty since the Cold War: How robust is the optimistic narrative?

Global Inequality and Global Poverty since the Cold War: How robust is the optimistic narrative?

CROP/UiB Global WORKING PAPER SERIES on Global Challenges, Issue #1. Authors: Peter Edward & Andy Sumner

No. 1 - October 2016


This series seeks to disseminate research focused on issues such as poverty and inequality, sustainability, and other relevant global Challenges.


Open access to the full publication is available through Bergen Open Research Archive (BORA), the open research archive at the University of Bergen:


Open access to FULL PAPER



Abstract

This paper considers how the growth in global consumption since the end of the Cold War, has impacted on the co-evolution of global inequality and poverty. It is often suggested that this era of growth has led to a dramatic reduction in global poverty and to the emergence of both a new global middle class and a more equal world. We argue that this dominant and optimistic narrative on globalisation since the Cold War is considerably more methodologically fragile than it at first seems. Further, we suggest that this has implications for the UN goal to end global poverty by 2030. The fall in inequality is almost exclusively attributable to the effect that the rise of China has had on betweencountry inequality. Changes in global inequality across the rest of the world are much more modest. Much heralded falls in global poverty have raised the consumption of the poorest, but the extent to which that is the case depends on where one draws the global poverty line as at the lower end of the global distribution a change of just 10c can remove 100 million people from global poverty headcounts. If one takes instead the average poverty line for all countries (a more genuinely global poverty line) of USD 5 per day poverty headcounts have hardly changed since the Cold War. Meanwhile, the numbers living at risk of sliding back into poverty (between USD 1.90 and USD 10 a day) grew by 1.6bn, compared to a rise of 1.1bn in the numbers living above this level, and around half of those living above this level saw their share of global consumption fall. We suggest therefore that the dominant or optimistic narrative, of falling poverty and an emerging 'middle class' largely free from the threat of poverty, disguises both considerable growth in the size of the 'global precariat' living in conditions that most in the developed world would consider to be well below 'middle class' and an erosion of the financial security of a significant proportion of those living at higher consumption levels.


12.09.2017
Share:         
UiB ISC

CROP News and Events

Organisational Changes at the CROP Secretariat

1 December 2018

The University of Bergen (UiB) and the International Science Council (ISC) have announced organisational changes at the CROP Secretariat.

Poverty as Ideology: Rescuing Social Justice from Global Development Agendas

December 2018

Forthcoming book by Andrew Fischer, Institute of Social Studies (ISS), winner of the International Studies in Poverty Prize awarded by the Comparative Research Programme on Poverty (CROP) and Zed Books

Problems and Options of Renewing Social Democracy

November 2018

CROP POVERTY BRIEF: By Olle Törnquist (Professor of Political Science and Development Research, University of Oslo)

News from CROPNET

SDG Conference Bergen

7-8 February 2019 | University of Bergen

re:thinking/re:working - Addressing the inequality of knowledge

CODESRIA 15th General Assembly

17-21 December, 2018 | Dakar, Senegal

EVENT: Africa and the Crisis of Globalisation.

Launch of International Science Council (ISC)

5 July (09.00-18.00 CEST)

LIVESTREAM: the founding of ISC will be celebrated with a Science Day.

Menu